Post-it Challenge 2
A collaborative retrieval activity where groups build on each other's knowledge by adding Post-it notes to a shared display, filling gaps and correcting errors as they rotate between stations.

What is post-it challenge 2?
- Set up stations around the room, each with a topic heading on a large sheet
- Groups visit each station and add Post-it notes with facts, ideas or connections
- Groups rotate to the next station, reading what others have written and adding more
- After all rotations, groups review their original station and discuss what was added

How it works
Post-it Challenge 2 builds on the individual recall of Post-it Challenge 1 by making it collaborative and cumulative. Large sheets are placed around the room, each with a different topic heading or question. Groups visit each station, read what is already there, and add their own contributions on Post-it notes.
The rotation element adds increasing challenge. At the first station, it is easy to add information. By the third or fourth station, the obvious facts have been written and learners must dig deeper into their knowledge. This natural differentiation means every learner is challenged regardless of their starting point.
Learners are also encouraged to challenge or question existing notes. If they see something they believe is incorrect, they can add a "question" note next to it. This develops critical evaluation alongside recall.
When groups return to their original station, they review everything that has been added. They check for accuracy, identify the most interesting contributions, and note what they had forgotten themselves. This review phase is rich in metacognitive thinking.
Post-it Challenge 2 works well for revision, for exploring multiple aspects of a broad topic, and for identifying collective gaps in knowledge across a class.
Classroom example
A Year 9 Humanities class in a Rhondda Cynon Taf school is revising for an assessment on climate change. Four stations are set up: Causes, Effects, Solutions, and Welsh Context. Groups of five rotate every four minutes. The first group at "Causes" writes the obvious entries: fossil fuels, deforestation, agriculture. The second group adds: methane from landfill, concrete production. The third group, running low on new facts, adds: "Is population growth a cause or an effect?" This question generates the best discussion of the review lesson.
Build thinking into your curriculum
Track thinking tools across every AoLE and progression step.
Join the waitlistCurriculum for Wales connection
Post-it Challenge 2 develops the "Reflect" strand of thinking skills through recall, evaluation, and metacognitive review. It supports the Four Purposes by developing "ambitious, capable learners" who can build on the thinking of others and "ethical, informed citizens" who critically evaluate information.
Rainbow Curriculum's Thinking Tools lens helps you plan where collaborative retrieval tools are embedded across your curriculum, ensuring that revision is active, social, and challenging.
Tips
- Four to six stations works well. More than six means groups spend too little time at each.
- Set a clear rotation signal and stick to it. Four minutes per station is usually right.
- A common pitfall: not reviewing at the end. The return to the original station is where the deepest learning happens.
- Use different coloured Post-it pads for each group so you can see who contributed what.
- Remove or flag incorrect notes during the review phase as a whole-class activity.
Source: Adapted from "How to develop thinking and assessment for learning in the classroom", Welsh Assembly Government, Guidance 044/2010.




